Yang 的个人资料Jarod·Selee的故事:Just an a...照片日志列表更多 工具 帮助

Zhao Yang

地点
机智好、好奇心重、心思善变、脑筋灵巧、举止随和、生性活泼、眼光锐利、口才佳、善推理、喜采访、擅长收集、懂变通、探查力佳、喜分析、会慌张、喜求新、会讥讽、适应力好、有点浮躁、心绪不定 我是一个很不错的人,除了以下缺点:
宿命 懒惰 急躁 怯懦 狭隘 被动 脆弱 犹豫 抱怨 推妥 空谈
侥幸 嫉妒 自私 拖沓 易怒 绝望 自满 贪婪 虚荣 无聊
虚伪 自大 放纵 怕苦 气馁 混日子 找借口

Me

Jarod·Selee的故事:Just an all-rounder

理性抑制本能,我的全才之路
第 1 张,共 47 张
11月20日

收工回家

附舌头图一张敬请观赏
11月11日

反安慰剂效应

也很好用





横粉
纵紫

9月11日

SH Contemporary 09



标题(See attached file: 艺术展.jpg)

9月6日

戏剧表演

9月6日13:00-16:30《话剧常识+表演基本素质游戏训练》,参观剧场,(梁新宇)
9月13日《台词与演讲》(杨毅)、《表演与社会道德》(陈新煌),
9月20日《身体训练+一人一故事工作坊》(臧宁贝、李震)
9月27日《100个字创作工作坊》(刘雷)
10月11日《导演理论》(聂本杰)、《戏剧创作技法》(任明炀)
10月18日《默剧表演工作坊》(孙丽翠)  
10月25日《即兴移动》(唐煌)、《舞台合成》(丁礼宁)

8月27日

激情犯罪愈演愈烈

有好办法么

8月26日

测试

http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/mind/surveys/smiles/

一个都没错

敏锐的观察力啊

虚情假意都一边待着去

8月21日

funny test

155253458367

:P

8月18日

大家自己对号入座

A
精神失常(Aberration)
急性应激障碍(Acute stress disorder)
適應障礙(Adjustment disorder)
情感障礙(Affective disorder )
廣場恐懼症(Agoraphobia )
酗酒 和藥物濫用(Alcoholism and substance abuse )
酒精和藥物依賴(alcohol and substance dependence )
失憶症(Amnesia)
懼高症(Acrophobia)
焦慮症(Anxiety disorder)
心因性厭食症(Anorexia nervosa)
反社會人格障礙(Antisocial personality disorder)
亞斯伯格症候群(Asperger syndrome)
注意力不足症(Attention deficit disorder)
注意力不足過動症(Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder)
自閉症(Autism)
逃避性人格障礙(Avoidant personality disorder)

B
喪慟(Bereavement)
恋兽癖(Bestiality)
藏書癖(Bibliomania)
暴食症(Binge eating disorder)
躁鬱症(雙極性情感疾病)(Bipolar disorder)
牛人并發症(Boanthropy syndrome)
軀體變形障礙(Body dysmorphic disorder)
邊緣性人格障礙(Borderline personality disorder)
短期性精神失常(Brief psychotic disorder)
飲食失調症(Bulimia nervosa)

C
猝倒(Cataplexy)
慢性抽動障礙(Chronic tic disorder)
兒童心理疾患(Childhood Disorder)
生理節律睡眠疾患(Circadian rhythm sleep disorder)
品行疾患(Conduct disorder)
轉化症(Conversion disorder)
性癔病(Conversion hysteria)
循環性精神病(Cyclothymia)
強迫性暴食(Compulsive Overeating)

D
谵妄(Delirium)
震顫性瞻妄(Delirium Tremens)
妄想症(Delusional disorder)
依賴型人格違常(Dependent personality disorder)
自我感喪失症(Depersonalization disorder)
抑鬱症(Depression)
失智症 (Dementia)
文字表達障礙(Disorder of written expression)
破壞行為疾病(Disruptive behavior disorder)
解離性失憶症(Dissociative amnesia)
解離症(Dissociative disorder)
解離性神遊(Dissociative fugue)
多重人格疾患(Dissociative identity disorder,DID)
性交疼痛(Dyspareunia)
低落性情感疾患(Dysthymic disorder)
唐氏綜合症(Down syndrome)
失读症 (Dyslexia)
消化障碍 (Dysthymic disorder)

E
情緒障礙(Emotional disorder)
大便失禁(Encopresis)
遺尿症(Enuresis)
癲癇(Epilepsy)
裸露癖(Exhibitionism)
語言表達障礙(Expressive language disorder)
模仿言語(Echolalia)
模仿動作(Echopraxia)
被爱妄想症(Erotomania)

F
偽病症(Factitious disorder)
女性性高潮障礙及男性性高潮障礙(Female and male orgasmic disorders)
女性性喚起障礙(Female sexual arousal disorder)
戀物癖(Fetishism)
二聯性精神病(Folie à deux)
摩擦癖(Frotteurism)

G
剛塞綜合徵(Ganser syndrome)
性別認同障礙(Gender identity disorder)
廣泛性焦慮症(Generalized anxiety disorder)
適應症候群(General adaptation syndrome)

H
致幻劑有關障礙(Hallucinogen related disorder)
表演型人格障礙(Histrionic personality disorder)
過動症(Hyperactivity disorder)
原發性嗜睡症(Primary hypersomnia)
性慾減退(Hypoactive sexual desire disorder)
疑病症(Hypochondriasis)
過動症候群(Hyperkinetic syndrome)
歇斯底里(Hysteria)
亨丁顿舞蹈症 (Huntington's disease)

I
衝動控制失調(Impulse control disorder)
間歇性爆發性障礙(Intermittent explosive disorder)
失眠症(Insomnia)

J
Joubert氏症候群(Joubert syndrome)

K
竊盜癖(Kleptomania)

L
學習障礙(Learning disorders)

M
躁狂症(Mania)
男性勃起障礙(Male erectile disorder)
多重人格(Multiple personality disorder)
孟喬森氏症候群(Munchausen's syndrome)
孟喬森代理綜合症(Munchausen by proxy)
數學障礙(Mathematics disorder)
智能不足/學習障礙(Mental retardation/Learning disability)

N
自戀性人格異常(Narcissistic personality disorder)
猝睡症(Narcolepsy)
精神官能症(Neurosis)
神經過敏症(Neuroticism)
夢魘症(Nightmare disorder)

O
強迫症(Obsessive-compulsive disorder)
強迫性人格障礙(Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder)
夢囈性精神病(Oneirophrenia)
對立反抗性疾患(Oppositional defiant disorder)

P
疼痛障礙(Pain disorder)
恐慌症(Panic attacks)
驚恐障礙(Panic disorder)
偏執型人格障礙(Paranoid personality disorder)
性慾倒錯(Paraphilias)
類睡症(Parasomnia)
病態賭博(Pathological gambling)
恋童癖(Pedophilia)
廣泛性發展障礙(Pervasive Developmental Disorder)
異食症(Pica)
創傷後壓力心理障礙症(Posttraumatic stress disorder )
產後抑鬱症(Postpartum depression)
早洩(Premature ejaculation)
原發性失眠(Primary insomnia)
精神神經病(Psychoneurosis)
精神病疾患(Psychotic disorder)
縱火狂(Pyromania)

R
學習障礙(Reading disorder)
Retts综合症 (Retts disorder)
反芻症(Rumination disorder)

S
分裂情感性疾患(Schizoaffective disorder)
類精神分裂人格異常(Schizoid personality disorder)
精神分裂症(Schizophrenia)
類精神分裂症(Schizophreniform disorder)
精神分裂性情感(Schizothymia)
分裂性人格障礙(Schizotypal personality disorder)
季节性情绪失调(Seasonal affective disorder)
分離焦慮症(Separation anxiety disorder)
自虐(Self-injury)
共有型精神病(Shared psychotic disorder)
睡眠障礙(Sleep disorder)
夜驚(Sleep terror disorder)
夢遊症(Sleepwalking disorder)
社交恐懼症(Social phobia )
身體化症(Somatization disorder)
特殊性發育障礙(Specific developmental disorder)
特定對象畏懼症(Specific phobias)
制式行為疾患(Stereotypic movement disorder)
口吃(Stuttering)
斯德哥爾摩症候群(Stockholm syndrome)

T
妥瑞症(Tourette syndrome)
短暫性抽動障礙(Transient tic disorder)
扮異性戀物症(Transvestic Fetishism)
拔毛癖(Trichotillomania)

V
阴道痉挛(Vaginismus)

7月19日

集电港收工

回家睡觉

天亮了还有无数的事情

嗬哟哟

4月16日

The Seven Levels of Photographers(zz from KenRockwell)

Artist: Top Level 7 (equivalent to "Heaven" in Christian mythology)

This is the highest level.

An artist fixes his imagination in a tangible form called a photograph. He captures the spirit of place or person, real or imagined, in this photograph and the viewer responds to this.

An artist is a complete master of his tools. When creating art an artist transcends common existence as his spirit flies up to meet that which he is capturing. He may practice and learn his tools while he is not creating, however when creating the camera becomes an extension of his mind. No conscious thought is expended on the technical issues with which he is a virtuoso while creating photographs.

To make a musical analogy, a musician may woodshed his scales, but when he's jamming he's not even thinking about fingerings. He's lost in the passion of the moment.

Just like professional surfers who have a dozen boards or pro guitarists who have 23 axes, an artist may have a slew of cameras, each for a different purpose.

Likewise, other artists may only have one camera, or none at all. It just doesn't matter.

Artists sometimes dress funny and tend to stay up late. They usually prefer to photograph attractive young women and are proud of it.

No one ever sees their work since they have crummy ability to promote themselves, and sadly, usually don't even appreciate their own excellent work. Those that do drop down to Whore, which sadly and paradoxically means you will never see the work of a true artist unless you know one personally. Good artists are usually too embarrassed to show their work to anyone unless you are intimate with them, since their work is their soul.

Artists use any sort of camera, including pinholes and disposables, or 8 x 10s. They use whatever instrument they need to create what they want.

Whore: Level 6

A whore is an artist who sells his soul by accepting money or drugs for his art.

By lowering himself to this level his vision is compromised.

Why? Because when one depends on selling one's soul to pay for one's food and pad one does not screw with the program, which means that one does not try new styles.

If a whore's work pays his bills after years of trying, it's unlikely any whore will be open to trying new styles while he still needs the dough.

Artists with representation (meaning they are represented by a gallery or an artists' representatives just as pimps do in the sex trade) may lose that representation if they change their style.

Therefore, art for sale from one person rarely gets better or different.

The style that sells is all a whore's johns and pimps (representatives) want to see. See Barnbaum's book on artistry. It is extraordinarily difficult for a successful whore to change styles once one has been accepted.

More about the whore class at level 10 here.

Amateur: Level 5 

People who earn less than half of their income from photography are amateurs. This has nothing to do with the quality of their photography.

This person loves to create photographs. Good amateurs of pure spirit can transcend the other levels directly to being an artist.

People who shoot weddings and etc. on weekends as a side line from their day jobs are still amateurs; they just charge for their photos. And as you read here they may also charge a lot for their snaps.

Amateurs who think that better cameras will improve their photos are at risk of descending to the lowest level of equipment measurbator. Too many amateurs have been misled by camera makers into thinking that they need good cameras for good images. This thought is poison to creating art.

Amateurs who lose themselves in creating great images are set for a path of enlightenment.

Being an amateur is a good thing; from this level one can rise to the level of artist rather easily.

Amateurs almost always shoot Canon SLRs.

Snapshooter: Level 4

This is my mom and most people. These people want memories, as opposed to photographs or cameras.

Snapshooters who are graphic artists or otherwise visually literate people often make fantastic images that impress everyone. These snapshooters are artists and don't even realize it. They usually dress better than the artists who think they really are artists.

Believe it: it's the photographer who makes an image, not a camera.

Snapshooters use point-and-shoot and disposable cameras, which give the same excellent results as the Leicas, Nikons, Canons and Contaxes used by everyone else.

Professional: Level 3 

A professional photographer is a person who earns his entire living (100%) from the sale of photographs.

Professionals do not create art for a living; they create images for commerce. They usually have some familiarity with the tools and can get out decent images, however they may or may not be able to capture imagination.

Of course professionals may create great images, but that's on their own time.

Professionals spend very little time worrying about cameras, except when they need to get them repaired. They spend most of their time looking for work and pissing about how all the other photographers in town are dropping their prices.

Professionals spend more on film and lab fees each month than they spend on camera gear in a year.

There are no professional nature photographers. They all either have day jobs or make their wives support them.

Professionals shoot Nikon SLRs, Mamiya medium format and Calumet 4x5" cameras. They cannot afford gear as good as most serious amateurs.

Unless you are a commercial photography buyer or know one as a friend you have not heard of professional photographers. The ones you may have seen in camera ads proclaiming that they use this or that camera are just spokesmodels.

Professionals don't have websites and don't put out technical newsletters. Those people are usually amateurs.

Rich Amateur: Level 2 

These are amateurs who, by having too much money, buy lots of equipment which can fetter their freedom of expression. They are mostly men, and many are old or retired.

Rich amateurs shoot Leicas, Contaxes, Alpas, Hasselblads and Linhof 4x5s. These are great cameras, but the results are the same as the Zenits, Pentaxes, Bronicas and Tachiharas.

Today they mostly shoot Canon 1Ds-Mk IIs, 5Ds or Nikon D2X.

These are the same idiots who bought the first 2.7 Megapixel digital SLRs designed for newspapers like the Nikon D1 back in 2000 just because they cost $5,000. They gave technically poorer results than the film cameras used by snapshooters. All because it's expensive doesn't make it good.

Bad rich amateurs think fuzzy B/W images of poor people are art.

Some rich amateurs fall into the bottom spiritual level easily because they worry too much about equipment, others go straight on to create great art since they don't have any worries about equipment since they think they own the best. Oddly, few rich amateurs produce ordinary work. It either rules or sucks.

Equipment Measurbator: Bottom Level 1 (equivalent to "Hell" in Christian mythology)

 

These men (and they are all men) have no interest in art or photography because they have no souls. Lacking souls they cannot express imagination or feeling, which is why their images, if they ever bother to make any, suck.

These folks have analysis paralysis and never accomplish anything.

Does poring over a microscope analyzing test images have anything to do with photographing a Joshua tree at dawn? Of course not. Even worse, time wasted concentrating on tests is time not spent learning useful aspects of photography and certainly time that could have been better spent actually photographing. Test just enough to know what your gear can do, and then get on with real photography.

They are interested solely in equipment for its own sake. They will talk your ear off for hours if you let them, but as soon as you ask to see their portfolio their bravado scurries away, or they think you want to see their cameras or stocks. You can read why cameras simply don't matter here.

Most seem to come from technical avocations, like engineering, computers and sciences. These people worry so much about trying to put numerical ratings on things that they are completely oblivious to the fact that cameras or test charts have nothing to do with the spirit of an image. Because they worry so much about measuring camera performance we have dubbed them "Measurbators." Unfortunately, many of them wander into KenRockwell.com looking for information on camera performance.

Many of them also play with audio equipment, computers or automobiles. They enjoy these toys just like their cameras for their own sake, but rarely if ever actually use them for the intended purposes.

Younger ones play video games or engage in chat rooms and web surfing. Older ones join "camera" clubs. (You should join photography clubs, but never camera clubs or any clubs that try to score art, since art is entirely subjective and cannot be scored numerically.) Likewise, these people never create anything notable with any of this other gear either, but they sure get excited by just having, getting or talking to you about it.

The one type of gear these people ignore is the only type of gear that actually helps: lighting.

Someone with a decent portfolio is not an equipment measurbator. Someone with more cameras than decent photos just may be. People with websites teeming with technical articles but few interesting photographs probably are.

Do not under any circumstances deal with these people, talk to them, read their websites or especially ask them for photography advice. To the innocent they seem like founts of knowledge, however their sick, lifeless souls would love to drag you into their own personal Hells and have your spirit forever mired in worrying about how sharp your lens is. If you start worrying about this and you'll never photograph anything again except brick walls and test charts.

These people are easy to identify. If you've read this far you've probably seen their websites. They always have lots of info about equipment, but very few real photographs. Beware of any information from any website not loaded with photography you admire.

Other people have other words for these people. This article here adds some more perspective.

I had to pull most of the photos of equipment off my site because these people were spending more time looking at my equipment than my art! The bandwidth for which I pay was being eaten up by these idiots looking at my lenses, instead of looking at the photos in my gallery which is the whole point of this site. That's why all the stupid pages like this one are in yellow, so that their eyes hurt too much to waste too much time on the nuts and bolts.

Most people who waste my time e-mailing me with technical and equipment questions through this site unfortunately belong to this unenlightened bottom group. Almost anyone who actually worries about the level they occupy belong to the bottom. Many of these folks stalk the Internet, and spend hours getting off "contributing" to technical websites and photography chat rooms like Photo.net, www.dpreview.com and photocritique.net instead of making photos. The guys here aren't too bad, and most of the Leica people here are just equipment collectors.

Online Expert or Armchair Photographer: Level 0 (these guys don't take pictures so they aren't a level of photographer.)

This level never existed before the internet, because cameras were never as exciting as sports cars or missiles for men to research.

This became terrifyingly apparent one day when I got an email from someone who didn't think an example I posted of a sharp lens was sharp. I was confused, since it was exceptionally sharp, which is why I posted it. When I asked this reader "not sharp compared to what?," he replied that it wasn't as sharp as a different example of a different lens he saw posted on some other website.

Holy Crap! This was a guy who doesn't even own a camera! He spends his time researching them and spreading his irrelevant opinions all over the Internet!

The Internet is ablaze with these guys. Forums and chat rooms are loaded with them. Photographers don't have the time for forums. We have more photography to do than time to do it. See The Two Kinds of Photographers.

Photography was never cool enough before digital to attract men's attention for no particular reason. Personally, the muzzle velocity of a Barrett 50-calibre sniper rifle is far more interesting to me than the MTF of a digital camera I'll never use. If I worked in an office and could waste my employer's time researching personal hobbies on the Internet, I'd rather look at pornography than research other people's cameras.

This level has existed in the automotive marketspace forever, with young boys learning every possible performance specification of Corvettes and Ferraris. We boys start this more than 10 years before we can get a driver's license, much less be able to buy our own Ferraris.

Boys love to learn about cars, guns, motorcycles and anything technical. I know I sure do. We men never grow out of wanting to know everything about everything, and telling you so.

Just because any car nut can tell you every possible performance specification of a Ferrari doesn't mean he can drive. Most of these people live in places where they've never even seen a Ferrari, much less ever owned one themselves.

Today with digital photography, we now have the same lookie-loos researching digital camera specs just for the bizarre fun of it. Ignore them. They love to talk and research, but aren't photographers.

 

转来的 随便看看

4月14日

昨晚

空气中的颗粒真少

看啥都那么的清晰

4月7日

其实咧

目击者越多
会救你的人就越少

12月18日

据说,我,

越来越憔悴了 越来越显老了...















mmd咋就快变成小老头了涅

11月20日

天气变冷了

马路上的痰迹越来越多了

11月5日

9k

9k
1
2
...
....
9K
 
6月13日

音响坏了...

发现接口奇特以至于拆不来...
 
接下来不知道应该选啥型号的音箱好了-_-///
 
 
3月19日

喷泉居然开了

面对着居然也会后知后觉
陆家嘴绿地

推断出:阵风,北偏东,四到五级

3月13日

会跳伞的拳王

被称为拳王是因为我四天内拥有了金腰带
 
Carmen说从地面上看我挂在降落伞下面的时候很像个木偶
 
 
上面的风景真好
2月22日

又加班了…

等等等等我等等等
退役x235的速度真是害死人啊
11月23日

做个备份(Uninst_failed_TCA.wkf)

workflow Uninst_Failed_TCA(in DestID) LocaleInsensitive
var SourceID
Get_DeployEngine_ID(SourceID)
var TioHome = Java[java.lang.System#getProperty("tio.home")]
var srcpath = Jython(TioHome + "/repository")
var srcfile = "UninstTCA.bat"
var tgtpath = "c:\\temp"
var tgtfile = srcfile
var srcname = DCMQuery(/Server[@id=$SourceID]/@name)
var tgtname = DCMQuery(/Server[@id=$DestID]/@name)
var ReturnCode
var ReturnResult
var ReturnErrorString
var tcareg = DCMQuery(/softwareinstallation[@name=]/@id)
log info Jython("copy:" + srcfile + "from" + srcpath + " " + srcname + "to" + tgtfile + "in" + tgtpath + " at " + tgtname)
Device.CopyFile(SourceID,srcpath,srcfile,DestID,tgtpath,tgtfile,"default","default","120")
var tgtcommand = Jython(cmd /c tgtpath + "\\" + tgtfile)
log info Jython("execute command:" + tgtcommand + "from" + tgtpath + "on" + tgtname)
Device.ExecuteCommand(DestID,tgtfile,tgtpath, "default","120",<null>,ReturnCode,ReturnErrorString,ReturnResult)
10月2日

加班啊加班~

加班中
据Pat说12点应该可以回家...
 
顺便发个web游戏,貌似有点小难度
 
8月24日

今日夜宵

高丽菜水饺



哦加班啊加班~~~

The pretender-The valentine's day

   
 
-What?
-They say it is better to love and lost than never to love at all.
-Do you believe that's true?
-If you are lonely, call the nine hundred number.
-Did you read my book?
-I skimed through it.
-You painted a pretty sad picture.
-I just write the way I see it.
-How do we be like this?
-Like what?
-Alone.
-Searching.
-It is ironic because we both want the same things.
-Someone to care about.
-Someone to care about us.
-Do you think we'll ever find that kind of love in our lives?
-What the hell do you want from me, Jarod?
-Open the box.
-''Be my valentine.''
8月22日

生物钟混乱了

俨然成为了生活在第比利斯的居民

疯了

 
My Custom Part|true|
尚未添加列表。